Detailed Notes on khula case law in pakistan
Detailed Notes on khula case law in pakistan
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which differ depending about the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case regulation citation in the state court might not be suitable, and even accepted, on the U.
Today educational writers are frequently cited in legal argument and decisions as persuasive authority; frequently, they are cited when judges are attempting to implement reasoning that other courts have not still adopted, or when the judge thinks the tutorial's restatement from the regulation is more persuasive than is often found in case regulation. Hence common regulation systems are adopting one of many methods very long-held in civil law jurisdictions.
The ruling with the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts right up until or unless possibly new regulation is created, or a higher court rules differently.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), clearly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion entails a shift to the higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, on the other hand, provides financial relief by positioning an employee inside a higher pay scale, without altering their task duties or position. It is a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same pay back scale for a protracted time, particularly when they deficiency prospects for promotion. Upgradation can be a policy Instrument used to relieve the hardship of very long-term stagnation. Read more
Many of the volumes (such as more recent volumes than the library's holdings) may also be readily available online through the Caselaw Access Project.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were informed of the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Secure with him in their home. The therapist confident them that they'd very little to worry about.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it is actually unclear how it relates to any supplied situation, typically rendering judgments based within the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances in the case at hand. This kind of decisions become a guide for future similar cases.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a properly-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives from the police would be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make sure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair for the offender and also the Magistracy is website to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of your respondents that pensionary benefits could be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These include things like if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.
10. Based around the findings in the inquiry committee, this petition isn't viewed as maintainable and it is therefore liable being dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
Since the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is achieved, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It's also a perfectly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is issue on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.